Epigenetic age tests
What is epigenetic age tests?
An epigenetic age test reads chemical tags called DNA methylation in a blood or saliva sample and turns them into a biological age or a pace of aging, using clocks such as Horvath, PhenoAge, GrimAge or DunedinPACE. Companies sell them directly to the public. They predict risk across large groups but are not validated for tracking one person.
Listed here because well-known people have tried it on themselves. Trying something is not recommending it; each entry says whether the person tells others to do it.
Who has tried it
Tried by 5 people we can source: 3 kept, 2 testing.
Kept
Bryan JohnsonEntrepreneur, founder of BlueprintBlueprint (Bryan Johnson)
Dates not stated · Does not recommend it to others
Tracks his pace of aging with the DunedinPACE epigenetic clock and in January 2025 reported 0.57, which he reads as aging about 7 months per calendar year.
“It’s to lower my speed of aging. So I’m currently at 0.57”
Interview Magazine, Bryan Johnson Wants You to Have Better Boners (January 2025) · Status checked January 28, 2025 · Suggest a correction
David SinclairGeneticist at Harvard Medical School, author of Lifespan
Dates not stated · Recommends it to others
Says his calculated biological age has fallen for a decade or more; he co-founded Tally Health, which sells an at-home biological age test.
“My calculated biological age has been going down for the past decade or more”
Fortune Well, Harvard biologist claims to be a decade younger thanks to these 4 lifestyle habits (March 2023) · Status checked March 16, 2023 · Suggest a correction
Mike LustgartenAging researcher, host of Conquer Aging Or Die Trying
Dates not stated · Recommends it to others
Has run 16 epigenetic tests and in September 2024 reported his youngest Horvath age yet, 6 years below his own; his videos list TruDiagnostic discount codes as ways to test yourself.
Conquer Aging Or Die Trying (YouTube), 6y Younger Horvath Epigenetic Age: My Best Data Yet (16-Test Analysis) (September 2024) · Status checked September 8, 2024 · Suggest a correction
Testing
Steve HorvathGeroscientist at UCLA, developer of the epigenetic clock
Dates not stated · Does not recommend it to others
Has run his own clock on himself and reads about three years younger than his age of 58, while saying the clock is only one window into aging and the basics matter most.
“The epigenetic clock is one window into biological aging, but it doesn't capture everything”
UCLA Health, A leader in the study of longevity is returning to UCLA Health (June 2026) · Status checked November 1, 2026 · Suggest a correction
Chris MasterjohnNutritional scientist and podcaster
Started Feb 2024 · Does not recommend it to others
Got his first DunedinPACE result, 0.66, called the clock experimental and possibly useful, and planned two more tests to check it against grip strength, VO2max and other measures.
“My first ever DunedinPACE results came in, and show that I am aging at 0.66 the normal rate”
Chris Masterjohn, I am aging at only 2/3 the normal rate! (February 2024) · Status checked February 18, 2024 · Suggest a correction
What the evidence shows
In large groups, the clocks work as research tools. The first multi-tissue clock estimated age from 353 methylation sites across most human tissues [1]. Later clocks trained on health data rather than age alone, PhenoAge and GrimAge, predicted death, heart disease and cancer better than age did [2] [3], and DunedinPACE, built from 20 years of decline in one birth cohort, predicted illness, disability and death [4]. A meta-analysis found that each 5 years of extra methylation age went with an 8 to 15% higher risk of death, while links with specific diseases were inconsistent [5].
For one person, the numbers are noisy. Technical noise alone moved six popular clocks by up to 9 years between repeat runs of the same sample [6], so a change of a few years between two consumer tests may be measurement error. Different clocks and companies can also disagree, and there are no shared standards between companies [7].
In trials, healthy habits move the clocks only a little. Two years of calorie restriction slightly slowed DunedinPACE but not other clocks [8], and 3 years of omega-3 slowed several clocks by about 3 to 4 months [9]. No study has shown that lowering a clock score lengthens life, and none has tested whether personal testing improves health. These are not diagnostic tests; even Bryan Johnson's page calls biological age claims preliminary [10].
Safety
- The sample is a blood draw, finger prick or cheek swab, so the physical risk is small. The main risk is acting on a noisy number.
- Repeat runs of the same sample can differ by years on popular clocks, and different clocks or companies can give one person different ages.
- These tests do not diagnose disease. A young score does not replace standard checks such as blood pressure, cholesterol, blood sugar and cancer screening.
- Many people who share their results have ties to test sellers: David Sinclair co-founded Tally Health, Steve Horvath founded a nonprofit that holds licenses to several of his clocks, and Mike Lustgarten shares TruDiagnostic discount codes.
- Results are health data. Check how a company stores, shares and deletes your sample and results before you buy.
Common questions
Does Bryan Johnson test his epigenetic age?
Yes. He tracks his pace of aging with DunedinPACE and in January 2025 said he was at 0.57, which he reads as aging about 7 months per year. A public leaderboard that uses TruDiagnostic's test listed him at 0.50 in November 2026. His own protocol page calls biological age claims preliminary [10].
What is Steve Horvath's own epigenetic age?
UCLA Health reported in June 2026 that Horvath, who built the first multi-tissue clock, had run the test on himself and read about three years younger than his age of 58. He says the clock is one window into aging and that the strongest evidence is for the basics, such as not smoking, exercise and sleep.
How accurate are consumer epigenetic age tests?
Can you lower your epigenetic age?
What does a DunedinPACE score mean?
It estimates how fast you are aging now rather than how old you are. A score of 1.0 means about one year of biological change per calendar year, and lower means slower. It was built from 20 years of health decline in one birth cohort [4].
Sources
- 1.Horvath S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biology, 2013. doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115
- 2.Levine ME, Lu AT, Quach A, et al. An epigenetic biomarker of aging for lifespan and healthspan. Aging (Albany NY), 2018. doi:10.18632/aging.101414
- 3.Lu AT, Quach A, Wilson JG, et al. DNA methylation GrimAge strongly predicts lifespan and healthspan. Aging (Albany NY), 2019. doi:10.18632/aging.101684
- 4.Belsky DW, Caspi A, Corcoran DL, et al. DunedinPACE, a DNA methylation biomarker of the pace of aging. eLife, 2022. doi:10.7554/eLife.73420
- 5.Fransquet PD, Wrigglesworth J, Woods RL, et al. The epigenetic clock as a predictor of disease and mortality risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Epigenetics, 2019. doi:10.1186/s13148-019-0656-7
- 6.Higgins-Chen AT, Thrush KL, Wang Y, et al. A computational solution for bolstering reliability of epigenetic clocks: Implications for clinical trials and longitudinal tracking. Nature Aging, 2022. doi:10.1038/s43587-022-00248-2
- 7.Young LJ. What New Biological Age 'Clocks' Say about Longevity, according to Eric Topol. Scientific American, 2025. Link
- 8.Waziry R, Ryan CP, Corcoran DL, et al. Effect of long-term caloric restriction on DNA methylation measures of biological aging in healthy adults from the CALERIE trial. Nature Aging, 2023. doi:10.1038/s43587-022-00357-y
- 9.Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Gängler S, Wieczorek M, et al. Individual and additive effects of vitamin D, omega-3 and exercise on DNA methylation clocks of biological aging in older adults from the DO-HEALTH trial. Nature Aging, 2025. doi:10.1038/s43587-024-00793-y
- 10.Johnson B. Bryan's Protocol (Don't Die protocol page). protocol.bryanjohnson.com, 2026. Link