AumniVIDA

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a))

Updated October 31, 2026 · 46 sources · Written by the AumniVIDA team

Units

What is Lp(a)?

Lp(a), or lipoprotein(a), is an LDL-like particle with an extra protein, apolipoprotein(a), attached. Your genes set most of your level, so one test in adulthood usually tells you where you stand for life. A level of 125 nmol/L (about 50 mg/dL) or more raises the risk of heart attack, stroke and aortic valve stenosis.

Cutaway illustration of a round lipoprotein particle with a lipid core, one large protein belt around it and a long beaded chain of looped protein segments attached at one point.
Lp(a) is an LDL particle with a second protein, apolipoprotein(a), wrapped around it and tied to ApoB.

Questions people ask about Lp(a)

  1. 01Lp(a) test: who should get one, cost and preparationAn Lp(a) test is a routine blood draw that needs no fasting, and most adults need it only once because genes set the level. The EAS, NLA, ESC/EAS and ACC/AHA now advise testing every adult at least once. Ask for a result in nmol/L; 125 nmol/L or more is high.Read the answer
  2. 02What does a high Lp(a) mean?A high Lp(a), usually 125 nmol/L (50 mg/dL) or more, means you inherited a gene variant that raises your lifelong risk of heart attack, stroke and aortic valve stenosis. It causes no symptoms. It is a reason to test your family and to lower your other risk factors earlier and harder.Read the answer
  3. 03What is a good Lp(a) level?A good Lp(a) level is below 75 nmol/L (about 30 mg/dL), the low-risk cutoff used by the EAS and NLA.Read the answer
  4. 04Can you lower Lp(a)?Not much, with today's tools.Read the answer

Key takeaways

  1. 1

    Lp(a) is mostly inherited: genes explain about 70% to over 90% of the differences between people [1], so most adults need only one test [2].

  2. 2

    About 1 in 5 people have an elevated level [3], yet only 0.3% of adults in one large US health system had ever been tested [4].

  3. 3

    Most guidelines call 125 nmol/L (about 50 mg/dL) or more high; the 2025 ESC/EAS update uses above 105 nmol/L [3][5].

  4. 4

    Genetic studies show high Lp(a) causes coronary disease and aortic stenosis rather than just travelling with them [6][7].

  5. 5

    Lifestyle barely moves Lp(a) and statins may raise it slightly [8]; lowering LDL cholesterol and ApoB is the current plan [5].

  6. 6

    The first Lp(a)-lowering outcome trial, of pelacarsen, missed its main goal in 2026; trials of three more drugs finish between 2028 and 2031 [9][10][11].

What is Lp(a)?

Lp(a) is a cholesterol-carrying particle built like LDL, with one extra protein, apolipoprotein(a), tied to its ApoB. It is measured separately from LDL cholesterol, and a standard cholesterol panel does not include it.

Lp(a) is said "L-P-little-a." Each particle has the same core as an LDL particle: cholesterol and fat wrapped in a shell with one apolipoprotein B (ApoB) molecule. What makes it Lp(a) is a second, much larger protein called apolipoprotein(a), or apo(a), linked to ApoB by a single chemical bond [12].

Kåre Berg described the particle in 1963 as a new inherited serum type [13]. Sixty years later, expert groups in Europe, North America and Japan agree that high Lp(a) is a common, mostly genetic and causal risk factor for heart disease [2][1][14].

Three facts make Lp(a) unusual among blood markers:

  • Genes set the level. About 70% to over 90% of the difference between people comes from genetics, mainly the LPA gene [1].
  • It stays put. Levels are highly consistent within a person over years [15], so one test in adulthood answers the question for most people [2].
  • Lifestyle does little. Diet and exercise move Lp(a) far less than LDL cholesterol. See can you lower Lp(a)?.

About 1 in 5 people have an elevated level [3], yet testing is rare: in one US health system, 0.3% of 5.5 million adults had ever been tested between 2012 and 2021 [4]. Start with who should get an Lp(a) test.

Cutaway illustration of a round lipoprotein particle with a lipid core, one large protein belt around it and a long beaded chain of looped protein segments attached at one point.
Lp(a) is an LDL particle with a second protein, apolipoprotein(a), wrapped around it and tied to ApoB.

How is Lp(a) different from LDL?

Lp(a) is an LDL particle with apolipoprotein(a) attached. Apo(a) is built from repeating loops that resemble plasminogen, a clot-dissolving protein, and it carries pro-inflammatory oxidized phospholipids into artery walls and heart valves.

Apo(a) is built from repeating loops

Apo(a) closely resembles plasminogen. It is made of folded loops called kringles, and one type, kringle IV type 2 (KIV-2), repeats many times; the first sequenced apo(a) carried 37 copies of one kringle [12]. In Danish studies, the total number of KIV-2 repeats across both copies of the gene ranged from 6 to 99 [16].

Fewer repeats mean higher levels

The repeat count sets the size of apo(a). People with small apo(a), fewer than about 23 kringle IV repeats, tend to have much higher Lp(a) [2]. In Copenhagen, the quarter of people with the fewest KIV-2 repeats averaged 56 mg/dL, against 15 mg/dL in the quarter with the most, and had a 50% higher heart attack risk [16]. Repeat number explains roughly 30% to 70% of the variation depending on ancestry; other variants in the LPA gene on chromosome 6 explain more [2][6].

Why apo(a) adds risk

The American Heart Association describes three ways Lp(a) promotes disease: plaque build-up, inflammation and clotting [1].

  • Plaque. Like LDL, Lp(a) enters the artery wall and leaves cholesterol behind. That is why it counts in an ApoB test.
  • Inflammation. Lp(a) carries oxidized phospholipids. In 504 people having coronary angiography, these tracked closely with Lp(a) (r = 0.83), and both were linked to the extent of coronary disease [17]. Lp(a) itself rises only slightly during inflammation, measured as CRP [18]; see hs-CRP.
  • Clotting. Its plasminogen-like shape led to the idea that it slows clot breakdown, but the 2022 EAS consensus found the evidence does not support Lp(a) as a cause of venous blood clots [2].

How Lp(a) differs from LDL

Proteins
LDL: One ApoB
Lp(a): One ApoB plus apo(a), linked by one disulfide bond
Extra cargo
LDL: None
Lp(a): Oxidized phospholipids, which are pro-inflammatory
What sets the level
LDL: Diet, weight, genes and drugs
Lp(a): Mostly the LPA gene: 70% to over 90% genetic
Effect of statins
LDL: Lowers LDL cholesterol
Lp(a): No fall; may rise 8.5% to 19.6%
Counted in an ApoB test
LDL: Yes
Lp(a): Yes

Sources: McLean 1987, Tsimikas 2005, Reyes-Soffer 2022, Tsimikas 2020.

Lp(a) shares LDL's cholesterol core and ApoB, then adds apo(a), which brings oxidized phospholipids and a genetic, diet-resistant level.

Why is high Lp(a) bad for your heart?

High Lp(a) raises the risk of heart attack, ischemic stroke and aortic valve stenosis, and genetic studies show it is a cause, not a bystander. People above the 95th percentile had about 3 to 4 times the heart attack risk of people with the lowest levels.

Population studies

A pooled analysis of 126,634 people in 36 studies found a continuous link: each 3.5-fold higher Lp(a) raised coronary risk by 13% after adjusting for other risk factors and ischemic stroke risk by 10%, with no link to cancer or other nonvascular deaths [15]. At the extremes the effect is large. In the Copenhagen City Heart Study, women and men with Lp(a) of 120 mg/dL or more had 3.6 and 3.7 times the heart attack risk of people below 5 mg/dL [19]. In 460,506 UK Biobank adults, risk rose in a straight line, by 11% for every 50 nmol/L [20].

Genetic evidence

Genes are handed out at conception, so a gene variant that raises Lp(a) works like a lifelong natural experiment, a method called Mendelian randomization. Two LPA variants raised coronary risk by 70% and 92%, and the link vanished once Lp(a) level was taken into account, which points to the particle itself [6]. Genetically raised Lp(a) carried a 22% higher heart attack risk per doubling [16].

Aortic valve stenosis

An LPA variant doubled the odds of aortic valve calcium per copy (odds ratio 2.05) and raised the risk of aortic stenosis by 68% per copy [7]. In 77,680 Danes, Lp(a) above 90 mg/dL predicted about three times the risk of aortic stenosis [21].

Risk on top of LDL

Lowering LDL cholesterol does not erase Lp(a) risk. In 27,658 people in statin trials, Lp(a) above 50 mg/dL raised risk even among those with the lowest achieved LDL cholesterol (hazard ratio 1.38) [22]. More detail is on what a high Lp(a) means.

Who should get an Lp(a) test, by guideline?

Most major guidelines now say every adult should have Lp(a) measured at least once, ideally with an early cholesterol test. HEART UK still recommends targeted testing, and every guideline puts people with early heart disease in the family, familial hypercholesterolemia or aortic stenosis first.

Advice has moved from selective to universal testing within seven years. The 2019 ESC/EAS guideline suggested one test for every adult [23]. The Canadian guideline followed in 2021 [24], the EAS consensus in 2022 [2], the National Lipid Association in 2024 [3], the ESC/EAS focused update in 2025 [5] and the ACC/AHA dyslipidemia guideline in 2026 [25][26]. HEART UK recommends targeted testing [27], and the 2026 Japanese consensus asks for one test in adulthood with a focus on high-risk groups [14].

The thresholds differ more than the testing advice. The table compiles each document's cutoffs as published; the 2018 ACC/AHA, 2019 NLA, 2019 ESC/EAS, HEART UK and Canadian rows follow the comparison by Kaur and colleagues [28][29][30]. The same 50 mg/dL appears as 100, 105 or 125 nmol/L, which shows how loose the conversion between units is.

Testing relatives pays off. In UK Biobank, 47% of first-degree relatives of someone with Lp(a) of 125 nmol/L or more also had a high level, against 16% of unrelated pairs [31]. Preparation, cost and repeat testing are covered in the Lp(a) test guide.

Lp(a) testing advice and risk thresholds by guideline, 2018 to 2026 [28]
GuidelineWho to testThreshold, nmol/LThreshold, mg/dLHow it is used
ACC/AHA cholesterol guideline (2018)No testing directive; Lp(a) listed as a risk enhancer125 or more50 or moreFavors starting a statin at borderline or intermediate risk
ESC/EAS dyslipidaemia guidelines (2019)Consider once in every adult's lifetimeAbove 430Above 180Flags inherited risk similar to familial hypercholesterolemia
NLA scientific statement (2019)Selected groups, such as early heart disease in the family or suspected FH100 or more50 or moreRisk enhancer
HEART UK consensus (2019)Targeted: early heart disease, FH, aortic stenosis, relatives above 200 nmol/L, borderline risk32 to 90 minor, 90 to 200 moderate, 200 to 400 high, above 400 very highNot stated in the sources we checkedManage overall risk above 90
Canadian Cardiovascular Society (2021)Once in a lifetime, with the first lipid screen100 or more50 or moreRisk modifier at intermediate risk
EAS consensus statement (2022)At least once in all adults; test relativesBelow 75 rule out, 75 to 125 grey zone, above 125 rule inBelow 30, 30 to 50, above 50Intensify risk factor care by overall risk and Lp(a)
NLA focused update (2024)At least once in every adult; test relativesBelow 75 low, 75 to 125 intermediate, 125 or more highBelow 30, 30 to 50, 50 or moreEarlier, more intensive LDL lowering
ESC/EAS focused update (2025)Consider at least once in every adult's lifetimeSlight rise from 62; above 105 clinically relevantFrom 30; above 50Risk modifier, mainly at moderate risk
ACC/AHA dyslipidemia guideline (2026)At least once in every adult; test relativesAbove 125 (about 1.4 times risk); above 250 (2 times or more)Not stated in the summary we checkedOffer earlier risk reduction whatever the LDL
Japan expert consensus (2026)At least once in adulthood, focus on high-risk groupsBelow 25 low, 25 to 125 intermediate, 125 or more highNot stated in the abstract we checkedAggressive LDL lowering

Lp(a) risk ranges and guideline cutoffs in nmol/L

Low riskGrey zoneHighVery highLow risk: 0 to 75 nmol/LLow risk: 0 to 75 nmol/LLow risk: 0 to 75 nmol/LLow risk: 0 to 75 nmol/LLow risk: 0 to 75 nmol/LLow risk: 0 to 75 nmol/LLow risk: 0 to 75 nmol/LGrey zone: 75 to 125 nmol/LGrey zone: 75 to 125 nmol/LGrey zone: 75 to 125 nmol/LGrey zone: 75 to 125 nmol/LGrey zone: 75 to 125 nmol/LHigh: 125 to 250 nmol/LHigh: 125 to 250 nmol/LHigh: 125 to 250 nmol/LHigh: 125 to 250 nmol/LHigh: 125 to 250 nmol/LHigh: 125 to 250 nmol/LHigh: 125 to 250 nmol/LHigh: 125 to 250 nmol/LHigh: 125 to 250 nmol/LHigh: 125 to 250 nmol/LHigh: 125 to 250 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LLow risk: 0 to 75 nmol/LLow risk: 0 to 75 nmol/LLow risk: 0 to 75 nmol/LLow risk: 0 to 75 nmol/LLow risk: 0 to 75 nmol/LLow risk: 0 to 75 nmol/LLow risk: 0 to 75 nmol/LGrey zone: 75 to 125 nmol/LGrey zone: 75 to 125 nmol/LGrey zone: 75 to 125 nmol/LGrey zone: 75 to 125 nmol/LGrey zone: 75 to 125 nmol/LHigh: 125 to 250 nmol/LHigh: 125 to 250 nmol/LHigh: 125 to 250 nmol/LHigh: 125 to 250 nmol/LHigh: 125 to 250 nmol/LHigh: 125 to 250 nmol/LHigh: 125 to 250 nmol/LHigh: 125 to 250 nmol/LHigh: 125 to 250 nmol/LHigh: 125 to 250 nmol/LHigh: 125 to 250 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/LVery high: 250 to 500 nmol/L075EAS, NLA low: 75 nmol/L105ESC/EAS 2025: 105 nmol/L125EAS, NLA, ACC/AHA high: 125 nmol/L200HEART UK high: 200 nmol/L250About 2x risk: 250 nmol/L430ESC/EAS 2019: 430 nmol/L500 nmol/L
Low risk
0 to 75
Grey zone
75 to 125
High
125 to 250
Very high
250 to 500
  • 75 nmol/L: EAS, NLA low
  • 105 nmol/L: ESC/EAS 2025
  • 125 nmol/L: EAS, NLA, ACC/AHA high
  • 200 nmol/L: HEART UK high
  • 250 nmol/L: About 2x risk
  • 430 nmol/L: ESC/EAS 2019
Guidelines draw the line for high Lp(a) between 105 and 125 nmol/L, and risk keeps climbing above that; 250 nmol/L roughly doubles risk.

How do you read an Lp(a) result?

Check the unit first. Results in nmol/L count particles and are preferred; results in mg/dL weigh them, and because particle weight varies with apo(a) size, the two cannot be converted exactly. Below 75 nmol/L (30 mg/dL) is low risk, and 125 nmol/L (50 mg/dL) or more is high.

Why the units do not convert

A mass result (mg/dL) weighs the whole particle, and a molar result (nmol/L) counts particles. Apo(a) differs in size between people, and even between a person's two gene copies, so two samples with the same number of particles can weigh different amounts [32]. Many antibody tests also read large and small apo(a) differently, which adds error [32]. The EAS gives no official factor; as a rough guide it uses 2 to 2.5 nmol/L per mg/dL [2]. The ESC/EAS 2025 update prefers nmol/L but accepts mg/dL [5].

Ancestry changes the typical level, not the risk per unit

In UK Biobank, median Lp(a) was 16 nmol/L in Chinese, 19 in White, 31 in South Asian and 75 in Black participants. The added risk per 50 nmol/L was similar across groups, with hazard ratios of 1.11, 1.10 and 1.07 in White, South Asian and Black participants [20]. The same cutoffs therefore apply, but a higher share of people of African ancestry cross them.

Things that shift a result

  • Kidney disease. Nephrotic syndrome raises Lp(a) 3 to 5 times [2].
  • Thyroid. Low thyroid function raises it, and treatment lowers it by 5% to 20% [2]. See TSH.
  • Menopause and pregnancy. Levels can rise after menopause and roughly double in pregnancy [2][5].
  • Meals. Normal food intake does not change Lp(a) [18].

For the range chart and what counts as a good level, see what is a good Lp(a) level.

Flat illustration of two balance pans, each holding the same number of beads, with larger beads on one pan making it sink lower.
Two samples can hold the same number of Lp(a) particles yet weigh differently, because apo(a) comes in many sizes; this is why nmol/L and mg/dL do not convert exactly.

What raises or lowers Lp(a)?

Genes set the baseline and lifestyle barely moves it. Statins can nudge Lp(a) up, PCSK9 inhibitors lower it by about a quarter, and new gene-silencing drugs lower it by 80% to over 95%, though none has yet been shown to prevent heart attacks.

The table brings together the effect of every option on Lp(a), from the trial or review that measured it [8][33][28][2][3][34][35][36][37][38], with trial status from the sponsors and ClinicalTrials.gov [9][10][39][11].

Three points stand out:

  • Statins do not lower Lp(a). They may raise it 8.5% to 19.6% [8], yet they remain the backbone of care because they lower LDL cholesterol and events [5].
  • Diet effects are small and run the wrong way. Replacing saturated fat with carbohydrate or unsaturated fat raises Lp(a) by about 10% to 15% [2], while the same swap lowers LDL cholesterol.
  • The new drugs work on the gene's message. Antisense and siRNA drugs block the liver from making apo(a), and muvalaplin, a pill, blocks assembly of the Lp(a) particle [40].

The full picture, including what people with high Lp(a) can do now, is on can you lower Lp(a).

What changes Lp(a), by how much, and where each option stands in October 2026 [28]
TherapyChange in Lp(a)Status
StatinsUp 8.5% to 19.6% in statin groups of six trialsApproved for LDL; not an Lp(a) treatment
PCSK9 inhibitor (evolocumab)Down 26.9% (median, FOURIER)Approved for LDL
NiacinDown up to about 30% in older studiesNo outcome benefit in HPS2-THRIVE; not advised for Lp(a)
Lipoprotein apheresisDown 68.1% per session; about 30% averaged over timeUS FDA indication in high-risk FH with Lp(a) 60 mg/dL or more
Postmenopausal hormone therapyDown about 25%Not used to treat Lp(a)
Pelacarsen (antisense injection)Down 35% to 80% by dose (phase 2)Phase 3 Lp(a)HORIZON missed its primary endpoint, September 2026
Olpasiran (siRNA injection)Down 70.5% to over 97% against placebo (phase 2)Phase 3 OCEAN(a)-Outcomes, 7,297 enrolled, due 2028
Lepodisiran (siRNA injection)Down 93.9% against placebo at 400 mg (phase 2)Phase 3 ACCLAIM-Lp(a), about 17,300 people, due 2029
Zerlasiran (siRNA injection)Down 81.3% to 85.6% against placebo (phase 2)No phase 3 outcome trial found in ClinicalTrials.gov
Muvalaplin (daily pill)Down 47.6% to 85.8% against placebo (phase 2)Phase 3 MOVE-Lp(a) recruiting, due 2031

How much each therapy lowers Lp(a)

Show the data
How much each therapy lowers Lp(a)
ItemValue (% lower)LowHighNote
PCSK9 inhibitor (evolocumab)26.9Median, FOURIER trial; approved for LDL
Niacin30Up to 30% in older studies; no outcome benefit
Lipoprotein apheresis68.13068.1Per session; about 30% averaged over time
Pelacarsen (antisense)803580Phase 2, by dose; phase 3 missed its main goal
Zerlasiran (siRNA)85.681.385.6Phase 2, time-averaged, placebo-adjusted
Muvalaplin (oral)85.847.685.8Phase 2, intact Lp(a) assay, placebo-adjusted
Lepodisiran (siRNA)93.940.893.9Phase 2, 400 mg, placebo-adjusted
Olpasiran (siRNA)97.470.597.4Phase 2, 75 mg every 12 weeks, placebo-adjusted
Existing drugs lower Lp(a) by about a quarter; gene-silencing drugs in trials lower it by 80% to over 95%. Statins are left out because they raise it slightly.

What does the evidence not show yet?

No trial has yet shown that lowering Lp(a) prevents heart attacks or strokes. The first outcome trial, of pelacarsen in 8,323 people with heart disease, lowered Lp(a) but missed its main goal, and results for three more drugs are due between 2028 and 2031.

Lp(a) was discovered in 1963, and the first test of whether lowering it prevents events read out in 2026. What is still unknown:

  • Whether lowering Lp(a) prevents events. Lp(a)HORIZON enrolled 8,323 people and did not meet its primary endpoint, a composite of cardiovascular death, heart attack, stroke and urgent coronary revascularization [9][41]. Full results are pending. Proposed explanations include treating people late, after decades of exposure and with advanced disease, strong background therapy and too little Lp(a) lowering [42].
  • How much lowering is enough. Genetic modeling suggests Lp(a) must fall by about 101.5 mg/dL to match the benefit of lowering LDL cholesterol by 38.67 mg/dL (1 mmol/L)1 mmol/L (38.67 mg/dL) [43]. Drugs that lower it by over 90% are now in outcome trials [10][39].
  • Whether valves benefit. No trial has shown that lowering Lp(a) slows aortic stenosis [2].
  • Whether very low levels carry their own risk. Very low Lp(a) has been linked to diabetes, which needs more study [2].
  • One threshold for everyone. Guidelines still disagree on whether high starts at 100, 105 or 125 nmol/L, and repeat tests can move people across those lines [44].

This page will be updated as the remaining trials report.

Lp(a) from discovery to outcome trials

  1. 1963

    Kåre Berg describes the Lp(a) particle as a new inherited serum type

  2. 1987

    Apo(a) is sequenced and found to resemble plasminogen

  3. 2005

    Lp(a) is shown to carry pro-inflammatory oxidized phospholipids

  4. 2009

    Genetic studies show high Lp(a) causes coronary disease

  5. 2013

    An LPA variant is linked to aortic valve calcium and stenosis

  6. 2019

    ESC/EAS advise one Lp(a) test in every adult's lifetime

  7. 2020

    Pelacarsen lowers Lp(a) by up to 80% in a phase 2 trial

  8. 2022

    EAS consensus sets 75 and 125 nmol/L cutoffs; olpasiran lowers Lp(a) by over 97%

  9. 2025

    Lepodisiran lowers Lp(a) by 93.9% in a phase 2 trial

  10. 2026

    ACC/AHA recommend testing every adult once; pelacarsen misses its outcome goal

  11. 2028

    Olpasiran outcome trial due to finish

  12. 2029

    Lepodisiran outcome trial due to finish

  13. 2031

    Muvalaplin outcome trial due to finish

It took 60 years to go from discovering Lp(a) to testing whether lowering it prevents heart attacks, and that answer is still not in.

The research

Foundational studies

The work that established what this marker means.

Guidelines and reviews

Where expert bodies and systematic reviews have landed.

Recent research

Notable work from the last three years.

What well-known voices say about Lp(a)

Their positions, summarized in our words. Follow each link for the full context.

  • Steven NissenCardiologist and Chief Academic Officer, Cleveland Clinic Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute

    Nissen argues that clinicians should start measuring Lp(a) now rather than waiting for drugs, because knowing a patient has high Lp(a) is a reason to treat all their other risk factors much more aggressively and to consider clinical trials. He has called elevated Lp(a) one of the last untreatable frontiers of cardiovascular risk and is enthusiastic about long-acting siRNA drugs such as lepodisiran, which he helped test.

    Cleveland Clinic Consult QD: Lipoprotein(a): Progress on One of the Last Untreatable Frontiers of Cardiovascular Risk (January 2024)

  • Benoît ArsenaultResearch scientist in cardiology and assistant professor of medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City

    On The Drive with Peter Attia, Arsenault describes Lp(a) as the single most important inherited trait for atherosclerotic heart disease, notes that about one in five people worldwide are in a higher-risk range, with the highest levels in people of African ancestry, and argues that simply getting people to measure Lp(a) would be a large step forward.

    The Drive podcast #210: Lp(a) and its impact on heart disease, with Benoît Arsenault, Ph.D. (June 2022)

Watch

Talks and explainers worth your time. Nothing loads from YouTube until you press play.

  • What is Lipoprotein(a)?

    American Heart AssociationOpen on YouTube

    A short, plain-language primer from the American Heart Association on what Lp(a) is and why it matters.

  • Lipoprotein(a) & 2026 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Management of Dyslipidemia

    American Heart AssociationOpen on YouTube

    Explains what the 2026 ACC/AHA guideline changed for Lp(a), including testing every adult once.

  • Explaining Lipoprotein (a) | Preventive Cardiology

    UT Southwestern Medical CenterOpen on YouTube

    UT Southwestern's preventive cardiology team explains what Lp(a) is and why it matters.

  • What is Lp(a) and why should you care about it.

    Cleveland ClinicOpen on YouTube

    A short Cleveland Clinic explainer on what Lp(a) is and why it is worth testing.

  • Lipoprotein (a) Elevation What Does it do to Increase CV Risk and What to Know About Treatment

    Mayo ClinicOpen on YouTube

    Mayo Clinic covers how high Lp(a) raises cardiovascular risk and what to know about treatment.

  • 210 - Lp(a) and its impact on heart disease | Benoît Arsenault, Ph.D.& Peter Attia, M.D.

    Peter Attia MDOpen on YouTube

    A long-form conversation on the genetics, biology and management of Lp(a) for readers who want depth.

Protocols that act on Lp(a)

Common questions

Is Lp(a) the same as apolipoprotein B?

No. ApoB is the protein on every LDL-like particle, including Lp(a); Lp(a) adds a second protein, apo(a), on top of ApoB [12]. An ApoB test counts all these particles together, while an Lp(a) test measures only the ones carrying apo(a).

What is the difference between Lp(a) and apolipoprotein A1?

They are unrelated despite the similar names. Apo(a) is the protein that defines Lp(a) and resembles plasminogen [12]; apolipoprotein A1 is the main protein of HDL cholesterol particles.

Is Lp(a) part of a standard cholesterol test?

No. A standard panel measures total, LDL and HDL cholesterol and triglycerides, so Lp(a) must be ordered separately. That is one reason only 0.3% of adults in one large US health system had ever been tested [4].

Does Lp(a) cause high cholesterol?

Not directly, but Lp(a) particles contain cholesterol, so very high Lp(a) adds to a measured LDL cholesterol value. Its main harm is independent of LDL: risk stays raised even when LDL cholesterol is very low on a statin [22].

Does Lp(a) change over time?

Very little in most adults. Levels are highly consistent over years [15], though they can rise after menopause and with kidney disease, and repeat tests vary by about 19% [5][44].

What is the ACCLAIM Lp(a) study?

ACCLAIM-Lp(a) is Eli Lilly's phase 3 outcome trial of lepodisiran, a long-acting injection that lowered Lp(a) by 93.9% in phase 2 [36]. It aims to enroll about 17,300 adults and is due to finish in 2029 [39].

What is the Amgen Lp(a) study?

Amgen's OCEAN(a)-Outcomes trial tests olpasiran, which lowered Lp(a) by over 97% in phase 2 [35]. It enrolled 7,297 people and is due to finish in 2028 [10].

What do Canadian guidelines say about Lp(a)?

The 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society guideline recommends measuring Lp(a) once in a lifetime as part of the first lipid screen [24], and treats 50 mg/dL (100 nmol/L) or more as a risk modifier [28].

Sources

  1. 1.Reyes-Soffer G, Ginsberg HN, Berglund L, et al. Lipoprotein(a): A Genetically Determined, Causal, and Prevalent Risk Factor for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2022. doi:10.1161/ATV.0000000000000147
  2. 2.Kronenberg F, Mora S, Stroes ESG, et al. Lipoprotein(a) in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and aortic stenosis: a European Atherosclerosis Society consensus statement. Eur Heart J, 2022. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac361
  3. 3.Koschinsky ML, Bajaj A, Boffa MB, et al. A focused update to the 2019 NLA scientific statement on use of lipoprotein(a) in clinical practice. J Clin Lipidol, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2024.03.001
  4. 4.Bhatia HS, Hurst S, Desai P, Zhu W, Yeang C. Lipoprotein(a) Testing Trends in a Large Academic Health System in the United States. J Am Heart Assoc, 2023. doi:10.1161/JAHA.123.031255
  5. 5.Mach F, Koskinas KC, Roeters van Lennep JE, et al. 2025 Focused Update of the 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias. Eur Heart J, 2025. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf190
  6. 6.Clarke R, Peden JF, Hopewell JC, et al. Genetic variants associated with Lp(a) lipoprotein level and coronary disease. N Engl J Med, 2009. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0902604
  7. 7.Thanassoulis G, Campbell CY, Owens DS, et al. Genetic associations with valvular calcification and aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med, 2013. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1109034
  8. 8.Tsimikas S, Gordts PLSM, Nora C, Yeang C, Witztum JL. Statin therapy increases lipoprotein(a) levels. Eur Heart J, 2020. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz310
  9. 9.Novartis. Novartis announces Lp(a)HORIZON Phase III topline results for pelacarsen in patients with elevated Lp(a) and established cardiovascular disease (CVD). Novartis media release, 2026. Link
  10. 10.Amgen. Olpasiran Trials of Cardiovascular Events and Lipoprotein(a) Reduction (OCEAN(a)) - Outcomes Trial, NCT05581303. ClinicalTrials.gov, 2026. Link
  11. 11.Eli Lilly and Company. Assessing the Impact of Muvalaplin on Major Cardiovascular Events in Adults With Elevated Lipoprotein(a) (MOVE-Lp(a)), NCT07157774. ClinicalTrials.gov, 2026. Link
  12. 12.McLean JW, Tomlinson JE, Kuang WJ, et al. cDNA sequence of human apolipoprotein(a) is homologous to plasminogen. Nature, 1987. doi:10.1038/330132a0
  13. 13.Berg K. A new serum type system in man: the Lp system. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand, 1963. doi:10.1111/j.1699-0463.1963.tb01808.x
  14. 14.Yoshida M, Ogura M, Tada H, et al. Lipoprotein(a) in Japan: An Expert Consensus Statement. J Atheroscler Thromb, 2026. doi:10.5551/jat.66330
  15. 15.Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration, Erqou S, Kaptoge S, et al. Lipoprotein(a) concentration and the risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and nonvascular mortality. JAMA, 2009. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1063
  16. 16.Kamstrup PR, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Steffensen R, Nordestgaard BG. Genetically elevated lipoprotein(a) and increased risk of myocardial infarction. JAMA, 2009. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.801
  17. 17.Tsimikas S, Brilakis ES, Miller ER, et al. Oxidized phospholipids, Lp(a) lipoprotein, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med, 2005. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa043175
  18. 18.Langsted A, Kamstrup PR, Nordestgaard BG. Lipoprotein(a): fasting and nonfasting levels, inflammation, and cardiovascular risk. Atherosclerosis, 2014. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.01.049
  19. 19.Kamstrup PR, Benn M, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG. Extreme lipoprotein(a) levels and risk of myocardial infarction in the general population: the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Circulation, 2008. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.715698
  20. 20.Patel AP, Wang M, Pirruccello JP, et al. Lp(a) (Lipoprotein[a]) Concentrations and Incident Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: New Insights From a Large National Biobank. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2021. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.120.315291
  21. 21.Kamstrup PR, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG. Elevated lipoprotein(a) and risk of aortic valve stenosis in the general population. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2014. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.038
  22. 22.Bhatia HS, Wandel S, Willeit P, et al. Independence of Lipoprotein(a) and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol-Mediated Cardiovascular Risk: A Participant-Level Meta-Analysis. Circulation, 2025. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069556
  23. 23.Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, et al. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J, 2020. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455
  24. 24.Pearson GJ, Thanassoulis G, Anderson TJ, et al. 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemia for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults. Can J Cardiol, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2021.03.016
  25. 25.Writing Committee Members, Blumenthal RS, Morris PB, et al. 2026 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Dyslipidemia: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation, 2026. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001423
  26. 26.American College of Cardiology. Prioritizing Health | Lower Sooner: How the 2026 Dyslipidemia Guideline Changes Practice. ACC.org, 2026. Link
  27. 27.Cegla J, Neely RDG, France M, et al. HEART UK consensus statement on Lipoprotein(a): A call to action. Atherosclerosis, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.10.011
  28. 28.Kaur G, Abdelrahman K, Berman AN, et al. Lipoprotein(a): Emerging insights and therapeutics. Am J Prev Cardiol, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100641
  29. 29.Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation, 2019. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625
  30. 30.Wilson DP, Jacobson TA, Jones PH, et al. Use of Lipoprotein(a) in clinical practice: A biomarker whose time has come. A scientific statement from the National Lipid Association. J Clin Lipidol, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2019.04.010
  31. 31.Reeskamp LF, Tromp TR, Patel AP, et al. Concordance of a High Lipoprotein(a) Concentration Among Relatives. JAMA Cardiol, 2023. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2023.3548
  32. 32.Marcovina SM, Albers JJ. Lipoprotein (a) measurements for clinical application. J Lipid Res, 2016. doi:10.1194/jlr.R061648
  33. 33.O'Donoghue ML, Fazio S, Giugliano RP, et al. Lipoprotein(a), PCSK9 Inhibition, and Cardiovascular Risk. Circulation, 2019. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037184
  34. 34.Tsimikas S, Karwatowska-Prokopczuk E, Gouni-Berthold I, et al. Lipoprotein(a) Reduction in Persons with Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med, 2020. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1905239
  35. 35.O'Donoghue ML, Rosenson RS, Gencer B, et al. Small Interfering RNA to Reduce Lipoprotein(a) in Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med, 2022. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2211023
  36. 36.Nissen SE, Ni W, Shen X, et al. Lepodisiran - A Long-Duration Small Interfering RNA Targeting Lipoprotein(a). N Engl J Med, 2025. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2415818
  37. 37.Nissen SE, Wang Q, Nicholls SJ, et al. Zerlasiran-A Small-Interfering RNA Targeting Lipoprotein(a): A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 2024. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.21957
  38. 38.Nicholls SJ, Ni W, Rhodes GM, et al. Oral Muvalaplin for Lowering of Lipoprotein(a): A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 2025. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.24017
  39. 39.Eli Lilly and Company. A Study to Investigate the Effect of Lepodisiran on the Reduction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Adults With Elevated Lipoprotein(a) - ACCLAIM-Lp(a), NCT06292013. ClinicalTrials.gov, 2026. Link
  40. 40.Alebna PL, Campbell MK, Harley K, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of targeted lipoprotein(a)-lowering therapies: A systematic review. J Clin Lipidol, 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2026.08.005
  41. 41.Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Assessing the Impact of Lipoprotein (a) Lowering With Pelacarsen (TQJ230) on Major Cardiovascular Events in Patients With CVD (Lp(a)HORIZON), NCT04023552. ClinicalTrials.gov, 2026. Link
  42. 42.Sabouret P, Giamundo DM, Asher E, et al. Pelacarsen and Lp(a)HORIZON: Interpreting the Disconnect Between Lipoprotein(a) Lowering and Cardiovascular Outcomes. Am J Med, 2026. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2026.10.005
  43. 43.Burgess S, Ference BA, Staley JR, et al. Association of LPA Variants With Risk of Coronary Disease and the Implications for Lipoprotein(a)-Lowering Therapies: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis. JAMA Cardiol, 2018. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1470
  44. 44.Lakkineni L, Waite M, David A, Jones B, Cegla J. Intraindividual variability in lipoprotein(a). J Clin Lipidol, 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2026.01.016
  45. 45.Willeit P, Ridker PM, Nestel PJ, et al. Baseline and on-statin treatment lipoprotein(a) levels for prediction of cardiovascular events: individual patient-data meta-analysis of statin outcome trials. Lancet, 2018. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31652-0
  46. 46.HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group, Landray MJ, Haynes R, et al. Effects of extended-release niacin with laropiprant in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med, 2014. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1300955

AumniVIDA explains health data for general wellness. Talk to your clinician about your own results, medication and diagnosis.

Track your Lp(a) over time.

Bring every lab report into one history, compare results with your own baseline, and ask the coach what changed. Join the iPhone beta.

Join the iPhone beta. We send TestFlight invitations in batches.