HbA1c chart: normal, prediabetes and diabetes ranges
Updated October 31, 2026 · 15 sources · Written by the AumniVIDA team
UnitsShort answer
A normal HbA1c is below 5.7% (39 mmol/mol)39 mmol/mol (5.7%). Prediabetes is 5.7 to 6.4% (39 to 47 mmol/mol)39 to 47 mmol/mol (5.7 to 6.4%), and 6.5% (48 mmol/mol)48 mmol/mol (6.5%) or higher is in the diabetes range, confirmed by a second test. These ADA thresholds apply at every age; NICE starts its high-risk range at 6.0% (42 mmol/mol)42 mmol/mol (6.0%) .
HbA1c ranges in percent: normal, prediabetes and diabetes
- Normal
- 4 to 5.7
- Prediabetes
- 5.7 to 6.5
- Diabetes range
- 6.5 to 9
- 5.7 %: ADA prediabetes
- 6 %: NICE and IEC high risk
- 6.5 %: ADA and WHO diagnosis
- 7 %: ADA goal for many with diabetes
Key takeaways
- 1
Normal: below 5.7% (39 mmol/mol)39 mmol/mol (5.7%); prediabetes: 5.7 to 6.4% (39 to 47 mmol/mol)39 to 47 mmol/mol (5.7 to 6.4%); diabetes range: 6.5% (48 mmol/mol)48 mmol/mol (6.5%) or higher [1].
- 2
- 3
- 4
A1c rises about 0.01 points per year of age, but diagnostic thresholds are not age-specific [6].
- 5
For many adults with diabetes, ADA suggests a goal below 7% (53 mmol/mol)53 mmol/mol (7%) [7].
What is a normal A1c level?
By ADA criteria, a normal A1c is below 5.7% (39 mmol/mol)39 mmol/mol (5.7%). NICE uses below 6.0% (42 mmol/mol)42 mmol/mol (6.0%) as the cut-off for high risk, and WHO sets no formal category below 6.5% [1] [2] [8].
The ADA threshold of 5.7% was chosen because it is more specific than the fasting glucose cut-off for identifying people who go on to develop diabetes [9].
Normal does not mean risk-free. In the ARIC study, adults at 5.5 to 5.9% had 1.86 times the diabetes risk of those at 5.0 to 5.4% [10]. Risk rises steadily across the range rather than switching on at one number [1].
What A1c levels mean prediabetes and diabetes?
ADA defines prediabetes as 5.7 to 6.4% (39 to 47 mmol/mol)39 to 47 mmol/mol (5.7 to 6.4%) and diabetes as 6.5% (48 mmol/mol)48 mmol/mol (6.5%) or higher. WHO, NICE and the International Expert Committee use the same 6.5% diagnostic threshold [1] [8].
The diabetes threshold of 6.5% came from the point at which moderate retinopathy becomes clearly more common [3]. The prediabetes range is where guidelines disagree: ADA starts at 5.7% [1], while NICE and the International Expert Committee start at 6.0% [2] [3], and WHO declined to set a lower category [8].
A single result in the diabetes range is not a diagnosis. ADA asks for two abnormal results, from the same test repeated or two different tests, unless there are clear symptoms with a random glucose of 200 mg/dL or more [1]. The high A1c page explains what each range means and what to do next.
| Category | ADA Standards of Care 2026 | WHO 2011 | NICE PH38 | International Expert Committee 2009 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Below 5.7% (below 39 mmol/mol) | No formal threshold below 6.5% | Below 6.0% (below 42 mmol/mol) | No lower threshold set |
| Raised risk | Prediabetes: 5.7 to 6.4% (39 to 47 mmol/mol)39 to 47 mmol/mol (5.7 to 6.4%) | Insufficient evidence for a formal category | High risk: 6.0 to 6.4% (42 to 47 mmol/mol)42 to 47 mmol/mol (6.0 to 6.4%) | 6.0 to 6.4% (42 to 47 mmol/mol)42 to 47 mmol/mol (6.0 to 6.4%): offer prevention |
| Diabetes | 6.5% (48 mmol/mol)48 mmol/mol (6.5%) or higher, confirmed | 6.5% (48 mmol/mol)48 mmol/mol (6.5%) or higher | 6.5% (48 mmol/mol)48 mmol/mol (6.5%) or higher, second test | 6.5% (48 mmol/mol)48 mmol/mol (6.5%) or higher, repeat test |
| Goal with diabetes | Below 7% (53 mmol/mol)53 mmol/mol (7%) for many adults | Not covered | Not covered | Not covered |
HbA1c ranges in mmol/mol (IFCC units)
- Normal
- 20 to 39
- Prediabetes
- 39 to 48
- Diabetes range
- 48 to 75
- 39 mmol/mol: ADA prediabetes
- 42 mmol/mol: NICE high risk
- 48 mmol/mol: Diagnosis
- 53 mmol/mol: ADA goal for many with diabetes
A1c chart from 4% to 14%
The chart below converts each A1c to mmol/mol and to estimated average glucose. For example, 6.5% is 48 mmol/mol and about 140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L)7.8 mmol/L (140 mg/dL); 8% is 64 mmol/mol and about 183 mg/dL [5] [4].
The mmol/mol column uses the IFCC to NGSP relationship from the 2004 method-comparison study [4]. The average glucose columns use the ADAG regression, eAG (mg/dL) = 28.7 x A1c minus 46.7 and eAG (mmol/L) = 1.5944 x A1c minus 2.594 [5].
Two cautions. First, ADAG published estimates for 5% to 12%; values outside that range extend the same formula. Second, each average glucose is a central estimate: at 7%, the 95% range of true averages ran from 123 to 185 mg/dL [5]. The average glucose page shows the spread for every value.
| A1c (%) | A1c (mmol/mol) | eAG (mg/dL) | eAG (mmol/L) | ADA category |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.0% | 20 | 68 | 3.8 | Below the prediabetes range |
| 4.5% | 26 | 82 | 4.6 | Below the prediabetes range |
| 5.0% | 31 | 97 | 5.4 | Below the prediabetes range |
| 5.5% | 37 | 111 | 6.2 | Below the prediabetes range |
| 5.7% | 39 | 117 | 6.5 | Prediabetes range (ADA) |
| 6.0% | 42 | 125 | 7.0 | Prediabetes range (ADA) |
| 6.5% | 48 | 140 | 7.8 | Diabetes range (ADA, WHO) |
| 7.0% | 53 | 154 | 8.6 | Diabetes range (ADA, WHO) |
| 7.5% | 58 | 169 | 9.4 | Diabetes range (ADA, WHO) |
| 8.0% | 64 | 183 | 10.2 | Diabetes range (ADA, WHO) |
| 8.5% | 69 | 197 | 11.0 | Diabetes range (ADA, WHO) |
| 9.0% | 75 | 212 | 11.8 | Diabetes range (ADA, WHO) |
| 9.5% | 80 | 226 | 12.6 | Diabetes range (ADA, WHO) |
| 10.0% | 86 | 240 | 13.4 | Diabetes range (ADA, WHO) |
| 10.5% | 91 | 255 | 14.1 | Diabetes range (ADA, WHO) |
| 11.0% | 97 | 269 | 14.9 | Diabetes range (ADA, WHO) |
| 11.5% | 102 | 283 | 15.7 | Diabetes range (ADA, WHO) |
| 12.0% | 108 | 298 | 16.5 | Diabetes range (ADA, WHO) |
| 12.5% | 113 | 312 | 17.3 | Diabetes range (ADA, WHO) |
| 13.0% | 119 | 326 | 18.1 | Diabetes range (ADA, WHO) |
| 13.5% | 124 | 341 | 18.9 | Diabetes range (ADA, WHO) |
| 14.0% | 130 | 355 | 19.7 | Diabetes range (ADA, WHO) |
What is a normal A1c by age?
A1c rises slightly with age, about 0.01 points per year in adults without diabetes, but guidelines use the same thresholds at every age. The upper normal limit (97.5th percentile) was 5.6 to 6.0% under age 40 and 6.2 to 6.6% at 70 and over [6].
In the Framingham Offspring Study and NHANES, A1c increased by 0.014 and 0.010 points per year in people without diabetes, even after excluding anyone with impaired fasting glucose or glucose tolerance [6]. The authors raised the question of age-specific criteria, but no major guideline has adopted them [1].
Treatment goals do change with age and health. ADA suggests below 7% (53 mmol/mol)53 mmol/mol (7%) for many nonpregnant adults with diabetes and sets goals individually, which often means less strict goals for older adults at risk of hypoglycemia [7]. Guidelines do not set different A1c ranges for men and women.
If you are older and your A1c sits just above 5.7%, part of the rise may simply reflect age [6]. That is a reason to look at the trend and at other markers, such as fasting glucose, rather than at a single result.
How do you convert A1c between % and mmol/mol?
Use mmol/mol = 10.929 x (A1c % minus 2.15), or A1c % = mmol/mol / 10.929 + 2.15. The formula comes from the method-comparison study that linked the IFCC reference method to the US NGSP scale [4].
The two units measure the same thing on different scales. The NGSP percent is traceable to the assay used in the DCCT, so it carries the meaning of the big outcome trials [11]. The IFCC unit counts glycated hemoglobin molecules per 1,000 hemoglobin molecules using a more specific reference method, which is why its numbers are not simply 10 times the percent [4].
Landmarks worth memorizing:
- 5.7% is 39 mmol/mol (ADA prediabetes) [1]
- 6.0% is 42 mmol/mol (NICE high risk) [2]
- 6.5% is 48 mmol/mol (diabetes threshold) [8]
- 7.0% is 53 mmol/mol (ADA goal for many adults with diabetes) [7]
Because the scales are not proportional, a change of 1 percentage point equals about 11 mmol/mol, and 1 mmol/mol equals about 0.09 points [4].
What A1c goal do guidelines set for people with diabetes?
ADA suggests an A1c goal below 7% (53 mmol/mol)53 mmol/mol (7%) for many nonpregnant adults with diabetes, adjusted for hypoglycemia risk and health. In pregnancy the ideal goal is below 6% (42 mmol/mol)42 mmol/mol (6%) if reachable without significant hypoglycemia [7] [12].
These goals rest on the trials that tied lower A1c to fewer complications. In UKPDS, each 1 point lower A1c was associated with 37% fewer microvascular complications [13]. Intensive control also brings more hypoglycemia, which is why goals are set for each person rather than pushed as low as possible [14] [7].
ADA also suggests a CGM goal of more than 70% time in range for many adults who use CGM [7] [15].
More about HbA1c
- HbA1c: the full guideHbA1c (A1c) is the percentage of hemoglobin in red blood cells that has glucose attached.
- How to lower HbA1cWeight loss, diet pattern, structured exercise and medication lower HbA1c most.
- What does a high HbA1c mean?A high HbA1c means more hemoglobin has glucose attached, usually because average glucose has been raised for months.
- HbA1c to average glucose: conversion chartEstimated average glucose (eAG) in mg/dL equals 28.7 x A1c minus 46.7, from the ADAG study of 507 people.
- HbA1c test: fasting, home kits and how oftenThe HbA1c test needs no fasting and is unaffected by a recent meal, stress or exercise.
Protocols that act on HbA1c
- Low-glycemic dietA low-glycemic diet favors carbohydrate foods that raise blood sugar slowly, rated by the glycemic index (GI): 55 or less is low and 70 or more is high.
- Time-restricted eatingTime-restricted eating means eating all of the day's food and caloric drinks within a consistent daily window, usually 6 to 10 hours, and fasting the rest of the day.
- Ketogenic dietA ketogenic diet keeps carbohydrate under about 20 to 50 g a day so the body burns fat and makes ketones, defined in supervised programs as blood BHB of 0.5 to 3.0 mmol/L.
- Mediterranean dietThe Mediterranean diet is an eating pattern built on vegetables, fruit, legumes, whole grains, nuts, fish and olive oil as the main fat, with little red or processed meat, butter or sweets.
Common questions
Is an A1c of 5.5 good?
Is an A1c of 5.7 bad?
What A1c level is considered diabetic?
What are A1c units in the UK?
Sources
- 1.American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee for Diabetes. 2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026. Diabetes Care, 2026. doi:10.2337/dc26-S002
- 2.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Type 2 diabetes: prevention in people at high risk (PH38). NICE public health guideline, 2012. Link
- 3.International Expert Committee. International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2009. doi:10.2337/dc09-9033
- 4.Hoelzel W, Weykamp C, Jeppsson JO, et al. IFCC reference system for measurement of hemoglobin A1c in human blood and the national standardization schemes in the United States, Japan, and Sweden: a method-comparison study. Clinical Chemistry, 2004. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2003.024802
- 5.Nathan DM, Kuenen J, Borg R, Zheng H, Schoenfeld D, Heine RJ; A1c-Derived Average Glucose Study Group. Translating the A1C assay into estimated average glucose values. Diabetes Care, 2008. doi:10.2337/dc08-0545
- 6.Pani LN, Korenda L, Meigs JB, et al. Effect of aging on A1C levels in individuals without diabetes: evidence from the Framingham Offspring Study and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001-2004. Diabetes Care, 2008. doi:10.2337/dc08-0577
- 7.American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee for Diabetes. 6. Glycemic Goals, Hypoglycemia, and Hyperglycemic Crises: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026. Diabetes Care, 2026. doi:10.2337/dc26-S006
- 8.World Health Organization. Use of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: abbreviated report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organization, 2011. Link
- 9.American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care, 2010. doi:10.2337/dc10-S062
- 10.Selvin E, Steffes MW, Zhu H, et al. Glycated hemoglobin, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk in nondiabetic adults. New England Journal of Medicine, 2010. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0908359
- 11.Little RR, Rohlfing CL, Wiedmeyer HM, Myers GL, Sacks DB, Goldstein DE. The national glycohemoglobin standardization program: a five-year progress report. Clinical Chemistry, 2001. PubMed 11673367
- 12.American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee for Diabetes. 15. Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026. Diabetes Care, 2026. doi:10.2337/dc26-S015
- 13.Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ, 2000. doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7258.405
- 14.Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group; Nathan DM, Genuth S, et al. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. New England Journal of Medicine, 1993. doi:10.1056/NEJM199309303291401
- 15.Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, et al. Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range. Diabetes Care, 2019. doi:10.2337/dci19-0028